As many of you know, I have been very interested in improving and reforming public education. One of the reasons that reform efforts have been disappointing is because we have always funded based on attendance. I think it is time to consider funding based on what is learned.
We don't simply want students in school, we want them to learn.
http://chum.ly/n/7a7752
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Food Stamps in the Commerce and Human Resource Committee
In Commerce and Human Resource Committee, a discussion was held concerning the problems caused by issuing all Food Stamps on the first day of the month. The issue was between the Northwest Grocers Association and the Department of Health and Welfare. The Northwest Grocers Association was concerned about the added costs i.e. the extra employees and the number of people, because of long lines, that leave food in their carts and walk out of the store which causes food spoilage.
The position of DHW said that it would cost more to issue Food Stamps over several days.
The Liberal Narrative is concerned about the health and budgets of the government agency budget, in this case, the DHW. The Conservative Narrative is concerned about the health and budget of private businesses which, by the way, are the ones that actually produce and distribute the food in the first place.
The vote was very predictable. The two Democrats and one Republican voted to hold the Department of Health and Welfare budget harmless by wanting to kill the bill. The 6 other Republicans voted to protect the budget of the Grocers and asked the DHW to implement the policy.
http://chum.ly/n/789a83
The position of DHW said that it would cost more to issue Food Stamps over several days.
The Liberal Narrative is concerned about the health and budgets of the government agency budget, in this case, the DHW. The Conservative Narrative is concerned about the health and budget of private businesses which, by the way, are the ones that actually produce and distribute the food in the first place.
The vote was very predictable. The two Democrats and one Republican voted to hold the Department of Health and Welfare budget harmless by wanting to kill the bill. The 6 other Republicans voted to protect the budget of the Grocers and asked the DHW to implement the policy.
http://chum.ly/n/789a83
Friday, March 4, 2011
Post from steventhayn at CHUMLY
Shaken Baby Syndrome
Shaken Baby Syndrome:: A resolution raising awareness on the dangers on shaking a baby. Please never, never shake a baby. It can cause death and permanent damage. Set the baby down and walk away rather than shake out of frustration.
http://chum.ly/n/734ced
Shaken Baby Syndrome:: A resolution raising awareness on the dangers on shaking a baby. Please never, never shake a baby. It can cause death and permanent damage. Set the baby down and walk away rather than shake out of frustration.
http://chum.ly/n/734ced
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
My Thoughts on Luna's Plan
Superintendent Luna's proposal to reform public education has provoked a profound response and divide. A quote from a teacher will illustrate this point;"I have never seen teacher morale at a lower point; they are frustrated, frightened, saddened, and exhausted by these plans while also trying to educate students. An employee's working conditions directly affect their productivity, no matter how hard they try to conceal it. It is a very scary situation, and it will only be made worse with the passage of these bills.” Idaho public school teacher
Which side is right? I am not sure. The reality is that both sides have valid points. Let me explain why I basically agree with the Luna Plan.
1. I believe that within five years it will be common to have students beginning in late elementary school through college to have one or more classes or parts of classes online or a class or subject partially taught with the help of a computer program. I don't believe that it is necessary to mandate 4 classes. It will happen naturally and they won't replace teachers.
2. The current public education system is expensive and not meeting the needs of many students because of our reliance upon direct-instruction. A better model is self-instruction or teacher moderated self-instruction. Technology is an important part of a self-instruction model.
3. Tax increases are needed to fund the current system. I cannot support tax increases. Changes need to be made.
Never the less, I have concerns about parts of Luna's proposal.
1. The state cannot buy technology and then decide how to use it. It is important that a specific purpose and goal/goals be identified and, then, purchase technology to meet these specific goals. It needs to me measurable and accountable. Luna's plan is not yet developed enough to do this. There will be a committee formed to bring recommendations back next session to justify the use of technology. If this committee does not make a good case for how the technology is to be used, I cannot support it.
2. Class size is a problem. All things being equal it is better to have a smaller class than a larger class. However, I am not completely convinced that the Idaho school system cannot maintain its current class size with fewer employees. This is an issue that should also be studied during the next 12 months. For example, if administrators taught one class per day and librarians and others including teachers, during their prep period, monitored an online class, class sizes could be kept near their current size.
3. Discipline is another issue of concern. We need to give administrators and teachers the ability to hold students accountable. How can we expect teachers to teach classes with more students without giving them the tools to maintain discipline?
4. The present school system has too many students that are not engaged in the learning process. We need more students that want to be in class. Interestingly, I sat through a presentation on how iPods and iPads can be used to engage these students. I am hopeful that technology can actually be part of the solution to this problem.
Finally, what direction should we take if we don't increase technology; if we don't consider and implement Luna's Plan? I have asked this question many times. The response I usually get is to increase taxes. It is my belief that the voters spoke very clearly last November that they did not want a tax increase. The main issue of both the Governor and Superintendent races was if we should raise taxes on education or not. Tom Luna got 60 percent of the vote or 93,000 votes more than his opponent saying he would not raise taxes.
I personally am committed to try to do the almost impossible task of improving public education with less money. I think it can be done and Luna's plan has some potential to accomplish this task; however, it must be monitored very closely and be well thought out before final implementation in 2012 (18 months from now).
http://chum.ly/n/6e853d
Which side is right? I am not sure. The reality is that both sides have valid points. Let me explain why I basically agree with the Luna Plan.
1. I believe that within five years it will be common to have students beginning in late elementary school through college to have one or more classes or parts of classes online or a class or subject partially taught with the help of a computer program. I don't believe that it is necessary to mandate 4 classes. It will happen naturally and they won't replace teachers.
2. The current public education system is expensive and not meeting the needs of many students because of our reliance upon direct-instruction. A better model is self-instruction or teacher moderated self-instruction. Technology is an important part of a self-instruction model.
3. Tax increases are needed to fund the current system. I cannot support tax increases. Changes need to be made.
Never the less, I have concerns about parts of Luna's proposal.
1. The state cannot buy technology and then decide how to use it. It is important that a specific purpose and goal/goals be identified and, then, purchase technology to meet these specific goals. It needs to me measurable and accountable. Luna's plan is not yet developed enough to do this. There will be a committee formed to bring recommendations back next session to justify the use of technology. If this committee does not make a good case for how the technology is to be used, I cannot support it.
2. Class size is a problem. All things being equal it is better to have a smaller class than a larger class. However, I am not completely convinced that the Idaho school system cannot maintain its current class size with fewer employees. This is an issue that should also be studied during the next 12 months. For example, if administrators taught one class per day and librarians and others including teachers, during their prep period, monitored an online class, class sizes could be kept near their current size.
3. Discipline is another issue of concern. We need to give administrators and teachers the ability to hold students accountable. How can we expect teachers to teach classes with more students without giving them the tools to maintain discipline?
4. The present school system has too many students that are not engaged in the learning process. We need more students that want to be in class. Interestingly, I sat through a presentation on how iPods and iPads can be used to engage these students. I am hopeful that technology can actually be part of the solution to this problem.
Finally, what direction should we take if we don't increase technology; if we don't consider and implement Luna's Plan? I have asked this question many times. The response I usually get is to increase taxes. It is my belief that the voters spoke very clearly last November that they did not want a tax increase. The main issue of both the Governor and Superintendent races was if we should raise taxes on education or not. Tom Luna got 60 percent of the vote or 93,000 votes more than his opponent saying he would not raise taxes.
I personally am committed to try to do the almost impossible task of improving public education with less money. I think it can be done and Luna's plan has some potential to accomplish this task; however, it must be monitored very closely and be well thought out before final implementation in 2012 (18 months from now).
http://chum.ly/n/6e853d
Monday, February 14, 2011
A Tax Increase is a Cut to Someone's Budget
Tom Luna has proposed changes to the public education system. Many of his ideas have been met with opposition. While I agree that changes need to be made to his plan, Superintendent Luna has raised a significant issue – how can we maintain the current system with less funding?
Most of those opposed to Luna's plan feel that public education funding cannot be cut. They say education is the key to the future. They say it is too important to cut. They propose raising more money through higher taxes.
Is this what the voters told us last November? No! They said to make do with what we have. I would like to point out that a tax increase is a cut to someone's budget. It is a cut to family budgets. It is a cut to business budgets. How much will unemployment increase if we raise taxes? How many more jobs will be lost if we raise taxes?
How many more parents will have to work two jobs if we raise taxes and will not have time to help their children with homework if we raise taxes?
http://chum.ly/n/6aad1b
Most of those opposed to Luna's plan feel that public education funding cannot be cut. They say education is the key to the future. They say it is too important to cut. They propose raising more money through higher taxes.
Is this what the voters told us last November? No! They said to make do with what we have. I would like to point out that a tax increase is a cut to someone's budget. It is a cut to family budgets. It is a cut to business budgets. How much will unemployment increase if we raise taxes? How many more jobs will be lost if we raise taxes?
How many more parents will have to work two jobs if we raise taxes and will not have time to help their children with homework if we raise taxes?
http://chum.ly/n/6aad1b
Friday, February 11, 2011
Education Debate can become a discussion
I have sent out many emails with ideas on how keep class size smaller. Citizens like this direction and are starting to enter into a discussion. This is great!
http://chum.ly/n/699c1d
http://chum.ly/n/699c1d
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)